Here are some specific cases for the subject verb agreement in English: For example, in standard English, one can say that I am where it is, but not “I am” or “it is”. This is because the grammar of the language requires that the verb and its subject coincide personally. The pronouns I and him are respectively the first and third person, just as the verbs are and are. The verbage form must be chosen in such a way as to have the same person as the subject, unlike the fictitious agreement based on meaning.   In American English, for example, the expression of the United Nations is treated as singular for the purposes of concordance, although it is formally plural. In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marking “with” are marked only on the name. This sentence refers to the individual efforts of each crew member. The Gregg Reference Manual provides excellent explanations for the subject-verb agreement (section 10: 1001).
Languages cannot have a conventional agreement at all, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. If you are referring to general groups or names, you should pay attention to the number and gender agreement. The very irregular verb is the only verb with more coherence than this one in the contemporary form. Most Slavic languages are very curved, with the exception of Bulgarian and Macedonian. The agreement is similar to Latin, for example. B between adjectives and substants in sex, number, case and animacy (if considered a separate category). The following examples are taken from the serbo-croacular: in Hungarian, the verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusator). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all.
(Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person). Also keep in mind the agreement that has been shown to be also in the subjunctive mind. Have you ever received the “subject/verb agreement” as an error on a paper? This prospectus helps you understand this common grammar problem. Another characteristic is the concordance in participations that have different forms for the sexes: compared to English, Latin is an example of a strongly curved language.